This workshop seeks to explore what it means to decolonise theory as a tool of colonial mastery, patriarchal domination, and white supremacist power. Rather than constituting an analysis of specific theories, this session will be conducted as a guided discussion with participants and facilitators. Thus, in the first place, we aim to reflect on the ways in which theories are linked to processes of bordering and othering, how the theoretical framework itself can form a border that aims to capture, separate and divide people, places, times, situations, experiences into specific categories/categorizations, hierarchies and statuses. Through this process, we want to challenge the idea of the expert and the hegemonically constructed assumptions about theory and knowledge and question the boundaries and borders that generally surround theory, putting it out of reach of the world majority of people. Far from taking an anti-theoretical stance, in the second place, the objective is to expand our conceptions of theory and unlock its liberatory potential. We will examine the characteristics of such a theory and think of the ways it can support emancipation and empowerment.
This workshop aims to get participants to reflect on questions regarding what theory is, and what it could be:
- What is theory to you? What do you first think about when hearing about theory ?
- Who has the right to produce theory, who gets to transmit theory and who has the right to receive it?
- What are we conditioned to view as theory?
- What theories get to be accused of non-theories or too much theory and which ones become hegemonically accepted?
- What kinds of knowledge do we view as non-theoretical, or even as invalid and how is traditional theory itself formed in order to exclude them and favour others?
- How can we make visible the falsely universal/hegemonic points of view?
- What would theory look like as a liberatory practice? How might we deconstruct theory and reconstruct it as a tool of empowerment?
- Can theory be poetry? Art? Graffiti? Movement?
“Appetizers”: 30 minutes
Discussion of your past experiences with theory. Has it been satisfying, filling, has it left you craving for more, or are you experiencing indigestion?
“Food for thought”: 30 minutes
We would also like the participants to think which of these materials that they brought to the “picnic” would work best to represent their own voice, current needs and location. What is being discussed here has already been presented at the preparation exercise.
“Recipes”: 15 minutes
We would discuss with participants what is a form of representation of their favourite theory (who represents whom and why? Invisible theories vs colonial imagery).
We expect this workshop to constitute a metadiscussion about theory that will draw on the previous sessions and activities to also contest the ocularcentrism in ways of thinking about theory only through vision. Participants will reflect on the materials they had prepared and brought to the “theory picnic” and position them in relation to this session’s discussion but also to the two previous sessions on the photography workshop and the split exercise. We would also like the participants to think which of these materials that they brought to the “picnic” would work best to represent their own voice, current needs and location. Would they feel comfortable to use these theories to represent the other participants? We will also ask them to produce a short presentation of how we might embody a politics of location in theorising that draws on all of our senses.